Erbs, Indictment handed down by Isaacson
April 7, 2011ERBS UPDATE JOHN DOE PROCEEDING
March 30, 2011
Criminal Indictment Attorney Patricia Baas
March 29, 2011
Criminal Indictment Attorney Pamela Veith, Judge Steven Cray
March 29, 2011
Vexatious Litigation Attorney Pamela Veith
March 29, 2011
Void, Ab Initio
December 5, 2010(this works in ANY situation, given that we are going for the throat (what actually makes a judge a judge, adjust as needed, but do not change up the Intent)…let me know if you need help, so we can get this over with and shut the corruption once and for all)
Motion to Void, Ab Initio (you are doing a motion, to return to the date of Date of Failure of the Court, where the judge practiced law, and broke canon ability…thereby breaking the Action of the court, or Court Process its self)
(filing ON EVIDENCE, with admission statement, the Judicial Canons, Constitution, Indemnification Treaty of 1802 (established the Code of Federal Regulations), and UCC (I would just do the table of contents, rather than the book, same with the Constitution)…
“Comes now Petitioner to pray upon this Court of Limited Jurisdiction (you are reminding them, they only have certain jurisdiction, they cannot follow the Constitution in your court, but they must follow Judicial Canon as this creates this court) to Void, Ab Initio any and all orders subsequent to inability of This Court to function, as to Judicial Canon, Constitutional Theory, Code of Federal Regulations, and or Uniform Commercial Code, on (date of order) (the void part, VOIDS every thing done after Date of Failure of the Court)
Under Judicial Canon, (Judge’s name), is not to practice law, however, on (date of order),Contrary to the rule of law , mandating Judicial Ability, Mr. (Judges last name ***now a civilian (the judge, practiced law, as an attorney, not a judge, thereby could not make an order, because he was not a judge according to canon ability)) issued an order that is void on its face at the inception of this case, whereupon Mr. (Judges last name, still a civilian) presumed, Interpleading Statute, via sua sponte, allowing Parens Patraie ability (parens patraei is the doctrine by which CIVIL court functions, this is when the state can PROTECT a civilian, but only with invitation…whilst practicing law, a judge is not acting as a judge, and is not an attorney, nor a social worker, thereby cannot invoke parens patraei or the function needed to protect you or the ex) when there was lack of jurisdiction to do so, also outside of Judicial Canon, whereupon the Fiduciary became stakeholder (A court is not to become owner of your assets, simply by assuming authority to be, thereby this one, is a lot like the action of burlgarly whereupon a burgler has the balls to take your things, because they can or they have opportunity to do so) of Mr. and Mrs. Public’s assets, without jurisdiction, and limiting due process of Mr. Public. This motion maintains the illegality of such under a Constitutional Republic, constituting Treason. This motion maintains the inability of such under Judicial Canon, C.F.R. and U.C.C. as ratified by (Your State) Revision ability.
There is appearance of Collusion in these matters (this is the pit…what this does is blankets a statement that someone is colluding without pointing fingers, thereby allowing every one to roll on every one else, this is repeated three times, as per action they have colluded to maintain), constituting fraud upon this Court, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel orally motioned for Interpleading ability, with full knowledge of conflict of interest. There is an appearance of Perversion of the Course of Justice, in these matters, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel failed to provide due process, prior to the hearing in which there was an oral motion, and subsequent Void orders of the Court for such, thereby also constituting Criminal Contempt whereupon the ability of this Court to function was impeded by such action, whereupon Mr (Judge’s last name, still a civilian) failed to Rule according to the law as to the Default, when Respondent failed to object, provide any evidence, or show up at said hearing where oral motion was made, and granted by Void order by Mr (Judges name, still a civilian).”
Motion to Void, Ab Initio
“Comes now Petitioner to pray upon this Court of Limited Jurisdiction to Void, Ab Initio any and all orders subsequent to inability of This Court to function, as to Judicial Canon, Constitutional Theory, Code of Federal Regulations, and or Uniform Commercial Code, on (date of order)
Under Judicial Canon, (Judge’s name), is not to practice law, however, on (date of order),Contrary to the rule of law , mandating Judicial Ability, Mr. (Judges last name ***now a civilian) issued an order that is void on its face at the inception of this case, whereupon Mr. (Judges last name, still a civilian) presumed, Interpleading Statute, via sua sponte, allowing Parens Patraie ability when there was lack of jurisdiction to do so, also outside of Judicial Canon, whereupon the Fiduciary became stakeholder of Mr. and Mrs. Public’s assets, without jurisdiction, and limiting due process of Mr. Public. This motion maintains the illegality of such under a Constitutional Republic, constituting Treason. This motion maintains the inability of such under Judicial Canon, C.F.R. and U.C.C. as ratified by (Your State) Revision ability.
There is appearance of Collusion in these matters, constituting fraud upon this Court, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel orally motioned for Interpleading ability, with full knowledge of conflict of interest. There is an appearance of Perversion of the Course of Justice, in these matters, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel failed to provide due process, prior to the hearing in which there was an oral motion, and subsequent Void orders of the Court for such, thereby also constituting Criminal Contempt whereupon the ability of this Court to function was impeded by such action, whereupon Mr (Judge’s last name, still a civilian) failed to Rule according to the law as to the Default, when Respondent failed to object, provide any evidence, or show up at said hearing where oral motion was made, and granted by Void order by Mr (Judges name, still a civilian).”
Valium, Xanax, Buffalo Wings, Diet Soft Drinks, and Legal Kidnapping by the Fiduciary
November 18, 2010
…And you wondered to yourself “but I do not do drugs” then after a while, via consensus reality you were convinced that you must have by a Delphi Practitioner, under Child Protection, the Courts, and even your “Representation” using duress to encourage or coerce you into taking a deal, since after all, you COULD get up to twenty years, but he was nice enough to take all your family assets, and reduce that to just two years, since that is how long a termination should take, whereupon the Judge just picked your child, to appear in some child porn, and later enter into the sex trade industry after some Child Protection-warehousing aka Grooming.
You are not alone, and in fact, every one else believed them too, since, after all, they are the protector….and this, is AmeriKKKa.
You were guilty of drug use, labeled as a Food, they create, maintain, and offer you KNOWING this is a SMOOTH way to legally kidnap children, since they also run the SKKKools, and every one is specialized, therefore retarded, and will never think that the ProteKKKtor is anything other than good…after all, we are all taught we are bad, and really strive hard to be good…
Sheeple, meet Comfort Foods, the feel great, valium without a prescription, snake in the grass, allowing such Atrocity, via Fiduciary Reign
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/gsfaonline/groups/details.html?id=162
Food Additive Group Details
| BENZOATES |
| The provisions that follow are defined at the additive group level, and thus apply to the total content of the additives participating in this group. Additives that make up this group are provided for reference only.
Participating Additive(s)
|
| GSFA Provisions for BENZOATES |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duration of effectsThe speed of elimination of a benzodiazepine is obviously important in determinisizeng the duration of its effects. However, the duration of apparent action is usually considerably less than the half-life. With most benzodiazepines, noticeable effects usually wear off within a few hours. Nevertheless the drugs, as long as they are present, continue to exert subtle effects within the body. These effects may become apparent during continued use or may appear as withdrawal symptoms when dosage is reduced or the drug is stopped. More information
More articles about benzodiazepines Therapeutic use Risk of dependence How dependence works Dependence on tranquillizing drugs Getting rid of addiction to benzodiazepiens Adverse effects for the elderly Long term usage Articles on Insomnia and Sleeping Problems Articles about addiction All articles about psychiatric drugs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
