Erbs, Indictment handed down by Isaacson

April 7, 2011

ERBS UPDATE JOHN DOE PROCEEDING

March 30, 2011

Criminal Indictment Attorney Patricia Baas

March 29, 2011

Criminal Indictment Attorney Pamela Veith, Judge Steven Cray

March 29, 2011

Vexatious Litigation Attorney Pamela Veith

March 29, 2011

ERBS File

March 16, 2011

ERBS October 18 Transcript of Proceedings

ERBS Admissions Statement Transcript October 18, 2010

ERBS Admissions Statement Transcript Sept 8 2010

ERBS Admissions Statement Re Transcript of Proceedings April 22 2010

ERBS Sept 8 Transcript

ERBS April 22 Transcript

ERBS Motion to show cause re vexatious litigation VEITH

ERBS Complaint INDICTMENT CRAY Veith

ERBS Motion to Compel Judicial Boundary Abjuration of the Realm

ERBS VOID AB INITIO

ERBS Motion to Show Cause re Criminal Contempt Roderick A Cameron

Mark Linquist adds me as a friend on Facebook, then deletes my first post to him

February 18, 2011

Winkle Case

January 20, 2011

http://www.scribd.com/tpepperman

Void, Ab Initio

December 5, 2010

(this works in ANY situation, given that we are going for the throat (what actually makes a judge a judge, adjust as needed, but do not change up the Intent)…let me know if you need help, so we can get this over with and shut the corruption once and for all)

Motion to Void, Ab Initio (you are doing a motion, to return to the date of Date of Failure of the Court, where the judge practiced law, and broke canon ability…thereby breaking the Action of the court, or Court Process its self)

(filing ON EVIDENCE, with admission statement, the Judicial Canons, Constitution, Indemnification Treaty of 1802 (established the Code of Federal Regulations), and UCC (I would just do the table of contents, rather than the book, same with the Constitution)…

“Comes now Petitioner to pray upon this Court of Limited Jurisdiction (you are reminding them, they only have certain jurisdiction, they cannot follow the Constitution in your court, but they must follow Judicial Canon as this creates this court) to Void, Ab Initio any and all orders subsequent to inability of This Court to function, as to Judicial Canon, Constitutional Theory, Code of Federal Regulations, and or Uniform Commercial Code, on (date of order) (the void part, VOIDS every thing done after Date of Failure of the Court)

Under Judicial Canon, (Judge’s name), is not to practice law, however, on (date of order),Contrary to the rule of law , mandating Judicial Ability,  Mr. (Judges last name ***now a civilian (the judge, practiced law, as an attorney, not a judge, thereby could not make an order, because he was not a judge according to canon ability)) issued an order that is void on its face at the inception of this case, whereupon Mr. (Judges last name, still a civilian) presumed, Interpleading Statute, via sua sponte, allowing Parens Patraie ability  (parens patraei is the doctrine by which CIVIL court functions, this is when the state can PROTECT a civilian, but only with invitation…whilst practicing law, a judge is not acting as a judge, and is not an attorney, nor a social worker, thereby cannot invoke parens patraei or the function needed to protect you or the ex) when there was lack of jurisdiction to do so, also outside of Judicial Canon, whereupon the Fiduciary became stakeholder (A court is not to become owner of your assets, simply by assuming authority to be, thereby this one, is a lot like the action of burlgarly whereupon a burgler has the balls to take your things, because they can or they have opportunity to do so) of Mr. and Mrs. Public’s assets, without jurisdiction, and limiting due process of Mr. Public.  This motion maintains the illegality of such under a Constitutional Republic, constituting Treason.  This motion maintains the inability of such under Judicial Canon, C.F.R. and U.C.C. as ratified by (Your State)  Revision ability.

There is appearance of Collusion in these matters (this is the pit…what this does is blankets a statement that someone is colluding without pointing fingers, thereby allowing every one to roll on every one else, this is repeated three times, as per action they have colluded to maintain), constituting fraud upon this Court, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel orally motioned for Interpleading ability, with full knowledge of conflict of interest.  There is an appearance of Perversion of the Course of Justice, in these matters, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel failed to provide due process, prior to the hearing in which there was an oral motion, and subsequent Void orders of the Court for such, thereby also constituting Criminal Contempt whereupon the ability of this Court to function was impeded by such action, whereupon Mr (Judge’s last name, still a civilian) failed to Rule according to the law as to the Default, when Respondent failed to object, provide any evidence, or show up at said hearing where oral motion was made, and granted by Void order by Mr (Judges name, still a civilian).”

Motion to Void, Ab Initio

“Comes now Petitioner to pray upon this Court of Limited Jurisdiction to Void, Ab Initio any and all orders subsequent to inability of This Court to function, as to Judicial Canon, Constitutional Theory, Code of Federal Regulations, and or Uniform Commercial Code, on (date of order)

Under Judicial Canon, (Judge’s name), is not to practice law, however, on (date of order),Contrary to the rule of law , mandating Judicial Ability,  Mr. (Judges last name ***now a civilian) issued an order that is void on its face at the inception of this case, whereupon Mr. (Judges last name, still a civilian) presumed, Interpleading Statute, via sua sponte, allowing Parens Patraie ability when there was lack of jurisdiction to do so, also outside of Judicial Canon, whereupon the Fiduciary became stakeholder of Mr. and Mrs. Public’s assets, without jurisdiction, and limiting due process of Mr. Public.  This motion maintains the illegality of such under a Constitutional Republic, constituting Treason.  This motion maintains the inability of such under Judicial Canon, C.F.R. and U.C.C. as ratified by (Your State) Revision ability.

There is appearance of Collusion in these matters, constituting fraud upon this Court, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel orally motioned for Interpleading ability, with full knowledge of conflict of interest.  There is an appearance of Perversion of the Course of Justice, in these matters, whereupon Respondent’s Counsel failed to provide due process, prior to the hearing in which there was an oral motion, and subsequent Void orders of the Court for such, thereby also constituting Criminal Contempt whereupon the ability of this Court to function was impeded by such action, whereupon Mr (Judge’s last name, still a civilian) failed to Rule according to the law as to the Default, when Respondent failed to object, provide any evidence, or show up at said hearing where oral motion was made, and granted by Void order by Mr (Judges name, still a civilian).”



Valium, Xanax, Buffalo Wings, Diet Soft Drinks, and Legal Kidnapping by the Fiduciary

November 18, 2010

…And you wondered to yourself “but I do not do drugs” then after a while, via consensus reality you were convinced that you must have by a Delphi Practitioner, under Child Protection, the Courts, and even your “Representation” using duress to encourage or coerce you into taking a deal, since after all, you COULD get up to twenty years, but he was nice enough to take all your family assets, and reduce that to just two years, since that is how long a termination should take, whereupon the Judge just picked your child, to appear in some child porn, and later enter into the sex trade industry after some Child Protection-warehousing aka Grooming.

You are not alone, and in fact, every one else believed them too, since, after all, they are the protector….and this, is AmeriKKKa.

You were guilty of drug use, labeled as a Food, they create, maintain, and offer you KNOWING this is a SMOOTH way to legally kidnap children, since they also run the SKKKools, and every one is specialized, therefore retarded, and will never think that the ProteKKKtor is anything other than good…after all, we are all taught we are bad, and really strive hard to be good…

Sheeple, meet Comfort Foods, the feel great, valium without a prescription, snake in the grass, allowing such Atrocity, via Fiduciary Reign

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/gsfaonline/groups/details.html?id=162

 

Food Additive Group Details

BENZOATES
The provisions that follow are defined at the additive group level, and thus apply to the total content of the additives participating in this group. Additives that make up this group are provided for reference only.

Participating Additive(s)

INS No. Additive Name
GSFA Provisions for BENZOATES
Number Food Category Max Level Notes
Food Category Hierarchy 14.2.7 Aromatized alcoholic beverages (e.g., beer, wine and spirituous cooler-type beverages, low alcoholic refreshers) 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 07.0 Bakery wares 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.7 Candied fruit 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 06.5 Cereal and starch based desserts (e.g., rice pudding, tapioca pudding) 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 05.3 Chewing gum 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.2.2 Cider and perry 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 05.1.3 Cocoa-based spreads, including fillings 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.5 Coffee, coffee substitutes, tea, herbal infusions, and other hot cereal and grain beverages, excluding cocoa 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 16.0 Composite foods – foods that could not be placed in categories 01 – 15 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.2.3 Concentrates for fruit juice 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.3.3 Concentrates for fruit nectar 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.3.4 Concentrates for vegetable nectar 600 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 05.2 Confectionery including hard and soft candy, nougats, etc. other than food categories 05.1, 05.3 and 05.4 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.12 Cooked fruit 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 09.2.4.2 Cooked mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms 2,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.2.2.8 Cooked or fried vegetables (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers, pulses and legumes, and aloe vera), and seaweeds 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 08.3.1.2 Cured (including salted) and dried non-heat treated processed comminuted meat, poultry, and game products 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 08.2.1.2 Cured (including salted) and dried non-heat treated processed meat, poultry, and game products in whole pieces or cuts 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 01.7 Dairy-based desserts (e.g., pudding, fruit or flavoured yoghurt) 300 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 05.4 Decorations (e.g., for fine bakery wares), toppings (non-fruit) and sweet sauces 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 13.5 Dietetic foods (e.g., supplementary foods for dietary use) excluding products of food categories 13.1 – 13.4 and 13.6 2,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 13.3 Dietetic foods intended for special medical purposes (excluding products of food category 13.1) 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 13.4 Dietetic formulae for slimming purposes and weight reduction 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.2 Dried fruit 800 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.2.2.2 Dried vegetables (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers, pulses and legumes, and aloe vera), seaweeds, and nuts and seeds 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 10.4 Egg-based desserts (e.g., custard) 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 02.3 Fat emulsions mainly of type oil-in-water, including mixed and/or flavoured products based on fat emulsions 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 02.2.2 Fat spreads, dairy fat spreads and blended spreads 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 02.4 Fat-based desserts excluding dairy-based dessert products of food category 01.7 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.10 Fermented fruit products 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.2.2.7 Fermented vegetable (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers, pulses and legumes, and aloe vera) and seaweed products, excluding fermented soybean products of food categories 06.8.6, 06.8.7, 12.9.1, 12.9.2.1 and 12.9.2.3 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 13.6 Food supplements 2,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.11 Fruit fillings for pastries 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.3 Fruit in vinegar, oil, or brine 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.2.1 Fruit juice 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.3.1 Fruit nectar 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.8 Fruit preparations, including pulp, purees, fruit toppings and coconut milk 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.9 Fruit-based desserts, including fruit-flavoured water-based desserts 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.6 Fruit-based spreads (e.g., chutney) excluding products of food category 04.1.2.5 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 05.1.5 Imitation chocolate, chocolate substitute products 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.1.2.5 Jams, jellies, marmelades 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 10.2.1 Liquid egg products 5,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.2.5 Mead 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 12.4 Mustards 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 11.4 Other sugars and syrups (e.g., xylose, maple syrup, sugar toppings) 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 06.4.3 Pre-cooked pastas and noodles and like products 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 12.7 Salads (e.g., macaroni salad, potato salad) and sandwich spreads excluding cocoa- and nut-based spreads of food categories 04.2.2.5 and 05.1.3 1,500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 12.6 Sauces and like products 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 12.2.2 Seasonings and condiments 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 09.3 Semi-preserved fish and fish products, including mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms 2,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 09.2.5 Smoked, dried, fermented, and/or salted fish and fish products, including mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms 200 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 15.1 Snacks – potato, cereal, flour or starch based (from roots and tubers, pulses and legumes) 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 12.5 Soups and broths 500 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 11.6 Table-top sweeteners, including those containing high-intensity sweeteners 2,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.2.2.6 Vegetable (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers, pulses and legumes, and aloe vera), seaweed, and nut and seed pulps and preparations (e.g., vegetable desserts and sauces, candied vegetables) other than food category 04.2.2.5 3,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.2.2.5 Vegetable (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers, pulses and legumes, and aloe vera), seaweed, and nut and seed purees and spreads (e.g., peanut butter) 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 04.2.2.3 Vegetables (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers, pulses and legumes, and aloe vera), and seaweeds in vinegar, oil, brine, or soybean sauce 2,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 12.3 Vinegars 1,000 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.1.4 Water-based flavoured drinks, including “sport,” “energy,” or “electrolyte” drinks and particulated drinks 600 mg/kg
Food Category Hierarchy 14.2.4 Wines (other than grape)


Benzodiazepines (Valium, Sobril, Xanax, Xanor, Mogadon, Rohypnol, etc.) Half Life (Duration of effect)

Intelligent natural language question-answering in the area of psychology and psychiatry. Ask a simple question  Local help Info

Go the top of the page Top Forum iconDiscuss this Forum iconGet personal advice Printer Print
Question(s):
Written by: Prof. Heather Ashton, DM, FRCP Emeritus Professor of Psychopharmacology School of Neurosciences, Division of Psychiatry, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, England, UK
First version: 22 Jul 2008. Latest revision: 28 Jul 2008.

What are the main differences between different benzodiazepines?
What is the duration of effects (half life) of Valium, Sobril, Xanax, Xanor, Mogadon, Rohypnol, etc.?

Answer:

Potency

A large number of benzodiazepines are available. There are major differences in potency between different benzodiazepines, so that equivalent doses vary as much as 20-fold. For example, 0.5 milligrams (mg) of alprazolam (Xanax) is approximately equivalent to 10mg of diazepam (Valium). Thus a person on 6mg of alprazolam daily, a dose not uncommonly prescribed in the US, is taking the equivalent of about 120mg of diazepam, a very high dose. These differences in strength have not always been fully appreciated by doctors, and some would not agree with the equivalents given here. Nevertheless, people on potent benzodiazepines such as alprazolam, lorazepam (Ativan) or clonazepam (Klonopin) tend to be using relatively large doses. This difference in potency is important when switching from one benzodiazepine to another, for example changing to diazepam during withdrawal, as described in the next chapter.

Speed of elimination

Benzodiazepines also differ markedly in the speed at which they are metabolised (in the liver) and eliminated from the body (in the urine). For example, the “half-life” (time taken for the blood concentration to fall to half its initial value after a single dose) for triazolam (Halcion) is only 2-5 hours, while the half-life of diazepam is 20-100 hours, and that of an active metabolite of diazepam (desmethyldiazepam) is 36-200 hours. This means that half the active products of diazepam are still in the bloodstream up to 200 hours after a single dose. Clearly, with repeated daily dosing accumulation occurs and high concentrations can build up in the body (mainly in fatty tissues). There is a considerable variation between individuals in the rate at which they metabolise benzodiazepines.

Note that traces of these drugs can be detected in the hair for as long time as the hair has been growing.

Table 1. BENZODIAZEPINES AND SIMILAR DRUGS 5

Benzodiazepines 5 Half-life (hrs) 1
[active metabolite]
Market Aim 2 Approximately Equivalent
Oral dosages (mg) 3
Alprazolam (Xanax, Xanor) 6-12 a 0.5
Bromazepam (Lexotan, Lexomil) 10-20 a 5-6
Chlordiazepoxide (Librium, Tropium) 5-30 [36-200] a 25
Clobazam (Frisium) 12-60 a,e 20
Clonazepam (Klonopin, Klonapin, Rivotril, Liktorivil) 18-50 a,e 0.5
Clorazepate (Tranxene) [36-200] a 15
Diazepam (Valium, Apzepam, Stesolid) 20-100 [36-200] a 10
Estazolam (ProSom) 10-24 h 1-2
Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol, Fluscand) 18-26 [36-200] h 1
Flurazepam (Dalmane) [40-250] h 15-30
Halazepam (Paxipam) [30-100] a 20
Ketazolam (Anxon) 2 a 15-30
Loprazolam (Dormonoct) 6-12 h 1-2
Lorazepam (Ativan, Temesta) 10-20 a 1
Lormetazepam (Noctamid) 10-12 h 1-2
Medazepam (Nobrium) 36-200 a 10
Nitrazepam (Mogadon, Apodorm) 15-38 h 10
Oxazepam (Serax, Serenid, Serepax, Sobril, Oxascand) 4-15 a 20
Prazepam (Centrax) [36-200] a 10-20
Quazepam (Doral) 25-100 h 20
Temazepam (Restoril, Normison, Euhypnos) 8-22 h 20
Triazolam (Halcion) 2 h 0.5
Non-benzodiazepines with similar effects 4 , 5 Half-life (hrs) 1
[active metabolite]
Market Aim 2 Approximately Equivalent
Oral dosages (mg) 3
Zaleplon (Sonata) 2 h 20
Zolpidem (Ambien, Stilnoct) 2 h 20
Zopiclone (Zimovane, Imovane, Zopiklon) 5-6 h 15
  1. Half-life: time taken for blood concentration to fall to half its peak value after a single dose. Half-life of active metabolite shown in square brackets. This time may vary considerably between individuals.
  2. Market aim: although all benzodiazepines have similar actions, they are usually marketed as anxiolytics (a, tranquilizers), hypnotics (h, sleeping pills) or anticonvulsants (e, reducing epileptic seizures or convulsions).
  3. These equivalents do not agree with those used by some authors. They are firmly based on clinical experience but may vary between individuals.
  4. These drugs are chemically different from benzodiazepines but have the same effects on the body and act by the same mechanisms.
  5. All these drugs are recommended for short-term use only (2-4 weeks maximum).

Duration of effects

The speed of elimination of a benzodiazepine is obviously important in determinisizeng the duration of its effects. However, the duration of apparent action is usually considerably less than the half-life. With most benzodiazepines, noticeable effects usually wear off within a few hours. Nevertheless the drugs, as long as they are present, continue to exert subtle effects within the body. These effects may become apparent during continued use or may appear as withdrawal symptoms when dosage is reduced or the drug is stopped.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers